Nonqualified deferred compensation (NQDC) can deliver considerable flexibility to executives and businesses — but without careful planning, companies can fall into regulatory traps and related concerns that may lead to costly surprises. Unlike qualified plans, NQDC isn’t as tightly governed by federal rules; it’s a contract between private parties. That gives employers and participants more room to customize — but it still demands considerable vigilance. In this article, NQP Consulting LLC will spotlight the main compliance pitfalls that can ensnare NQDC programs and offer practical insights on how you can avoid them.
Our company brings trusted expertise and solutions in NQDC. Whether you work in real estate or law, connect with NQP Consulting today.
1. Misclassifying the Timing of Deferrals or Distributions
One of the most frequent mistakes involves improper specification of when compensation is deferred or paid. Under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), a deferral election must be made at or before the year in which the compensation is earned. If the terms of payment, such as the distribution date or triggering events, differ materially from what was elected, the arrangement may violate 409A.
Practical Step:
Have deferral elections drafted with clear, specific dates or events (e.g., “December 31, 2028” or “six months after separation from service”). Double-check that election windows and payment dates align precisely with the written agreement.
2. Vague or Inconsistent Triggering Events
A second common issue involves ambiguous or open-ended triggering events, such as “upon termination” or “at retirement.” These phrases can prove problematic if not clearly defined. Section 409A requires that distributions occur in line with predetermined, unambiguous events.
Practical Step:
Clearly define terms in contracts. Distinguish between “voluntary termination,” “involuntary termination,” “retirement at or after age 65,” and so on. Avoid language like “upon change in control” without defining the control threshold or the scope of the change.
3. Wrong Handling of Short-Term Deferrals
Section 409A contains a safe harbor for short-term deferrals: payments made within 2½ months after the end of the taxpayer’s applicable tax year. If businesses fail to track this window precisely, they risk unintended noncompliance.
Practical Step:
Build compliance systems that monitor deferrals and corresponding payments — and flag any distributions that risk exceeding 2½ months. Automate alerts for deadline proximity to avert overshoot.
4. Deferral Elections Made Too Late
If executives or employees make deferral elections too late — after they have an economic right to compensation —the plan may fall outside 409A safe harbors. This usually happens when companies allow last-minute changes without following formal election timelines.
Practical Step:
Set strict deadlines, such as requiring deferral elections by Dec. 31 for the following year’s compensation. Record and date all election forms, and keep them locked in once the window closes. Apply limitations on revisions to prevent back-dating or retroactive changes.
5. Failure to Address Post-Separation Health or Retirement Benefits
Some NQDC plans mix retirement or health-related benefits with deferrals — like post-separation medical reimbursements or “retirement” premiums. Those items could fall under 409A unless properly structured.
Practical Step:
Separate deferred compensation from other benefits. If you need to offer post-separation medical reimbursements, consider crafting them as termination severance or use a Section 105(h) health reimbursement arrangement. Are you offering a retirement-style benefit? Perhaps make it part of a bona fide pension arrangement, not tacked onto an NQDC contract.
6. Neglecting to Include Acceleration Restrictions
Employers sometimes overlook the requirement that 409A prohibits acceleration of distributions, except under limited exceptions (e.g., a participant’s death). Granting a board or plan administrator the discretion to accelerate timing later on can doom compliance.
Practical Step:
Write NQDC agreements to state explicitly that no acceleration is permitted — unless triggered by an allowed 409A exception — and make that non-acceleration policy irrevocable. Avoid giving authority to alter payment terms after the fact.
7. Mixing Qualified and Nonqualified Elements Improperly
It’s easy to blur the lines between qualified plans [like 401(k)s] and NQDC programs. When eligibility or deferral timing overlaps, compliance issues may arise, notably if you treat deferrals as employer matches or company contributions.
Practical Step:
Keep qualified and nonqualified plans entirely separate. Use distinct forms, policies, and governance for each. That reduces confusion and helps prevent cross-program spillover that could be interpreted as a violation.
8. Ignoring State-Level Income Tax Timing Triggers
While 409A is federal, state tax authorities may recognize deferral arrangements differently. Some states may tax compensation in the year it vests — or when it’s substantially certain to be paid — unless language defers taxation.
Practical Step:
Coordinate with tax advisors to understand treatment in your state. Use explicit wording in agreements about when income is considered taxable. Structures like “substantial risk of forfeiture” may help delay state-level recognition.
9. Poor Record-Keeping and Lack of Documentation
Nonqualified plans thrive on precision. When documentation is incomplete or inconsistent, audits or disputes breed costly delays or penalties — particularly under IRS scrutiny of 409A.
Practical Step:
Save all deferral elections, amended agreements, board approvals, and payment calculations in a secure and searchable system. Perform annual audits of your record-keeping practices. During audits, having airtight documentation helps resolve questions rapidly.
10. Failure to Stay Up-to-Date on Rule Changes
While Section 409A has been largely stable since its introduction in 2004, courts and IRS rulings occasionally offer new interpretations. Meanwhile, other regulations, such as proposed changes to financial accounting standards (ASC 718), could affect deferred compensation reporting.
Practical Step:
Subscribe to alerts from reputable compensation law firms or tax authorities, and schedule a periodic compliance review. Training for plan administrators and HR professionals helps as well — particularly when new rulings emerge.
Navigate Compensation With Greater Ease
NQDC can allow employers and executives to create flexible, highly tailored compensation arrangements — keenly aligned with performance, retention, or long-term goals. Yet that freedom brings responsibility: noncompliance with Section 409A risks steep excise taxes, IRS interest, and reputational damage. By committing to crystal-clear election timing, precise event definitions, careful separation from other benefit programs, and rigorous documentation, businesses can substantially reduce their risk. Staying proactive through ongoing education and compliance reviews positions NQDC programs as powerful tools rather than legal landmines.
At NQP Consulting LLC, we partner with clients to create strong NQDC plans and structures. If you want to safeguard your deferred compensation strategy and avoid compliance pitfalls, contact us to talk through your current arrangements. We can help you craft agreements that deliver value and protect integrity. Get in touch with our team today.
